Experience: An Exhaustive Perception

 

Our experience is an experience of energy which is entangled to be an experience of energy. 

    A key feature of energy as a vital concept in the physical universe is its conservation property. 

    In this sense, the state of energy of the local universe is and always has been changing due to a series of transformations, each different from the last as the physical conditions are still changing as we speak.

    The kinetic movement of particles is a part of the transformations that are governed by the same set of rules that keep going as long as the physical conditions allow it, around the observer's point of reference.

    However, the nature of the state of energy of the local universe which is changing is not invariant since it changes due to the cumulative effects of its multitudes of transformations that are subject to different conditions since time is still passing.

    It is unknown if there is an absolute increase of order, or an absolute increase in disorder as the weighted entanglements, one at a time, presumably requires an increase of order and then an increase in disorder.

    This is however possible only if we accept the possibility of a universal point of reference, and that the weighted entanglements are found and registered at the same point of reference.

    If the point of reference is instead universal, and the weighted entanglements can be registered from the same point of reference, then we can presume the operation of a set of rules that apply to all and are universally correct, which can then be defined as universal morality.

    The kinetic movement of particles is a result of an infinite weighted entanglement in an infinitely small region of space we call a relative subjective point in spacetime. 

    The singularity of our universe is the reflection of the kinetic movement of particles that emerged from an infinitely weighted entanglement in an infinitely small region of space we call the origin of the spacetime of our universe.

    This weighted entanglement we shall call is both causal and acausal as it relates to the physical world and probably extends into other realms, but during the process of the weighted entanglement it appears to be one entanglement but in fact, it is two, hence the two opposing movements.

    In the original experiments, we may be able to determine if the other branch of the entanglement connects to the past of our branch or the future of our branch. 

    Think of placing an object in a river. 

    The river moves toward the ocean and you see that object travel toward the ocean as well. 

    The river also has an unseen branch behind the location of the object, so that the object travels downstream and into a branch of the river that flows backward in time and upstream away from the ocean. 

    You observe the object flowing downstream towards the ocean, but there is also a branch of the river that the object is flowing upstream in. 

    So, you may be now able to determine if the branch or entanglement of the object flows toward the future or toward the past? 

    Weighted entanglement may give us the answer to this question because it may be possible for a system to be in a state of weighted entanglement. 

    Quantum physics does not allow for a particle to exist in two places at the same time, instead, it exists in two places that are somehow related to each other. 

    That the mysterious connection underlying the entanglement operates both forward and backward at the same time, but so what? 

    There is no way that a time machine can have any effect on our present reality other than us being able to observe it, so what is so important about having the ability to determine which direction the entanglement goes? 

    Well, as it turns out there is basically only one way to have a future time traveler view the present, either in a dream or in a computer model. 

    We do not directly live in the 4th dimension because that would mean that we would be able to look into the past and see our past, so the rotation of time only allows for access to the past through memories or recordings. 

    So if we want a time traveler to know if the model is capable of looking back into past works, we need some method of running a test on the system. 

    Traditionally we measure the direction of time through the entropy of a system. 

    The entropy of a system always increases or the system is subjected to complete chaos. 

    Think of the movement of particles in a wildfire destroying a forest for a low entropy system. 

    We may now be able to determine the direction of entanglement through the weight of physical objects by reasoning that the branch of the river of time that travels downstream must have higher entropy, then the branch of time that travels against the flow of time, but only because we have another way of determining the direction of time. 

    But, this takes us back to the branch of the river traveling upstream of time. Since the branch exists but we cannot observe it, unless we are able to travel upstream, then we are able to look upstream and determine the direction of time through weighted entanglement, but why is this important? 

    It is important because time is cyclical. 

    If time is cyclical, then it may be possible to travel downstream of time into the past, and determine the direction of weight entanglement, then we are to travel with the flow of time back to our starting point. 

    This is as close as we can get to a real time machine, but if we want to actually change the past, then we are only able to change the past through some disaster such as an asteroid strike. 

    My guess is that there is a branch that averages the amount of entropy in the two systems, different from the two variations of the two weighted entanglements. 

    So, one branch is in equilibrium, and the other branch has a higher amount of entropy. 

    The past branch of time may also have a branch of time traveling back and forth across itself, so that the past branch of time may also be entangled. 

    There is a possibility that there is a much larger system that has the combined versions of all of the weighted branches, and it may be possible for consciousness to move around inside that larger system. 

    Let us think of how a chameleon chooses when to change color in order to blend into its surroundings as a conscious decision, as opposed to a chemical reaction to light. 

    When a person wakes up, they may have dreamed that they swam across a river and they exited onto a beach. 

    The beach is the repose of a memory that is surrounded and blended with seemingly current memories of the previous day’s events. 

    So, each time that the person wakes up, they are at a different place within the rest of their universe, but it is a place that exists as a memory of people, places, and things experienced in the past. 

    Each time a person wakes up, several of the past events that already occurred will repeat and blend with the past events that were not experienced yet, but were already created. 

    One part of the system has higher entropy, the other has lower entropy, in the overall system the system stays the same. 

    A person would be able to travel backward in time and into the lower entropy portion of the entanglement system because the lower entropy portion is where similar events are stored. 

    In the lower entropy portion of the weighted entanglement, is where the system changes. 

    Think of a line of people that you know, and each day you change the order of the people that you know, and when you are done, you write their names down on pieces of paper and place them in a stack. 

    The way that you arrange the people that you know, is dependent on the direction of time, but they are still the same people. 

    The order of the people that you know, is what changes as a result of time, but they are still the same people. 

    The stack of paper that contains the rearranged people are the memories of the person and is ordered by the passage of time. 

    The future is a different order of the same events and the reverse is true for the past, but the future and past branches of the system are still entwined into the same entanglement. 

    The weighted entanglement begins to reorganize the memory of the person, because from the vantage point of the person, it may be possible for the person to be able to change the order of their memories and see what happens to their future or past. 

    The first test for having a real time machine is to determine if the person has the ability to change the order of the people that they know and then see if the future changes in the same manner. 

    I have seen future events unfold the same way that I imagined my future to go, but I was never able to break out of the events by changing the order of the events. 

    It is like there is a force that takes over and makes sure that the events unfold in the same way, no matter how much I have tried to change the order of the events. 

    When I am doing my best to forget about a situation, the events of the situation find me, even when I go out of my way to avoid these situations. 

    I think that it is because I am stuck on the train of time and if I want the events of my future or past to change, I need to be liberated from the gravitational pull of the sun and then be able to see the motion of the planets as they circle around the sun. 

    The Sun is the combined weighted entanglement, and the planets are the lower entropy portions of the combined weighted entanglement. By moving away from the combined weighted entanglement, then I am able to see the motion of the planets, and the direction of time is determined by the entropy in each system, but only if we can travel along the lower entropy portion of time. 

    The best way to find the lower entropy portion of time is to change the weighted entanglement in one direction of time, then see the results in the other direction of time. 

    So, if I am able to change the weighted entanglement of my future, then I should be able to see the results in the past.

    One method that I have found to be successful, is to change the average meaning of my fate into a more realistic and universal perspective. I have found that this method has created meaning where there was none, to begin with. Or none that could be perceived in the past, at least.

 

    In this line of thought (which is proposed for review and comment), the universe is in a state of energy due to the series of weighted entanglements it has undergone, is undergoing, and is going to undergo, and is a result of an infinite weighted entanglement in an infinitely small region of space which can be defined as the singular origin of the spacetime of our universe. 

    We define the nature of time as essentially a weighted value for the momentum of dual connections following an overall entropic flow. 

    This leads to a sequence of time that may in fact be analyzable by the sum of a finite sequence of random events that belongs to the set -inf>inf, which could be a fourth-dimensional plane of reality that is represented by the entire graph of 4-dimensional coordinate systems, i.e. 4d space-time.

 

    This source of energy is an incredibly efficient source of energy that we can define as a state of energy that is both primary, and at the same time secondary, as it relates to the physical world and probably extends into all its realms, but during the process of its emergence it is not singularly one energy source, though within it appears to be one single source of energy as both emerge at the same time, hence the two opposing movements.

    If so, it should be possible to theoretically describe the behavior of all forms of energy, including the physical, thermal, electrical, chemical, nuclear, gravitational, and others.

    If this line of thought is followed, it should be possible to develop a comprehensive theory of both the natural and sentient evolution of the universe and create a coherent unified field theory that explains everything down to the observable facts that support it.

    Which is an immense second-to-none task to accomplish.

    The weight of this argument rests in the way it describes the universe and observes that entropy is only a part of the effects that take place within the system of the spatiotemporal universe.

    However, in other scenarios, a simpler, more elegant solution may exist.

 

 

    The implication is that not all state of energy is equivalent as it seems. 

    If this asymmetry of the state of energy is well captured, we may be able to define consciousness. 

    This is the central thesis of Quantum Entanglement. 

    In particular, the event horizon of black holes may be an example of a state of energy that is not the same as all other states of energy. 

    The phenomenon of entanglement singularity is similar to the idea of a black hole. 

    How does Quantum Entanglement relate to the science of entropy? 

    Or, since entropy and time are related, how does the physics of time relate to Quantum Entanglement? 

    The context of Quantum Entanglement is a physical system, with multiple (probabilistic or nonprobabilistic) states. 

    This is different from the context of the Riemann manifold, with multiple tangent spaces. 

    But there exists a relation between Quantum Entanglement and the context of the Riemann manifold via entropic gravity. 

    The context of the Riemann manifold is the context of Special Relativity, therefore suggesting the possible unification of Quantum Entanglement and General Relativity. 

 

    This thought process leads to a few predictions: 

1. Energy and information (aka information entropy) entanglement is a natural and universal phenomenon. 

2. There are states of information entanglement that are distinguishable from other states of information entanglement using the concept of contextual distinctness. This is the same as the principle of subjective perspectivism or relativism. 

3. There are states of information entanglement that are distinguishable from other states of information entanglement using the concept of probabilistic distinctness. This can be seen as the superposition density values for any given entanglement in relation to the origin or singularity.

 

    The experience is a result of energy distributed over the network of neurons in the brain and energy is entropic. 

    So, by this assertion, it is implied that our experience is entropic as well. 

    This is a key insight that implies that our level of sentience is related to the degree of entropic evolution of the cosmos. 

    Another way of putting it is that our consciousness is a late by-product of the randomizing process of the evolution of the cosmos. 

    Without entropy, no experience.